<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Charles-Henry Ruyant &#187; Louis Vuitton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.charles-henry.com/tag/louis-vuitton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.charles-henry.com</link>
	<description>Online Marketing, Search Engine, SEO, SMO and  SERM</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:59:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A new Search Engine Reputation Management issue</title>
		<link>http://www.charles-henry.com/2009/10/search-engine-reputation-management-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.charles-henry.com/2009/10/search-engine-reputation-management-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles-Henry Ruyant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SERM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis Vuitton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charles-henry.com/?p=513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of the search engine reputation management (SERM) issues exist because people are unhappy with the brand or the company has some negative news (strikes, delays, redundancies&#8230;). When I was looking for Louis Vuitton on Google UK, the results page wasn’t what I was expected. There were no negative results about the brand but there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the search engine reputation management (SERM) issues exist because people are unhappy with the brand or the company has some negative news (strikes, delays, redundancies&#8230;).</p>
<p>When I was looking for Louis Vuitton on Google UK, the results page wasn’t what I was expected. There were no negative results about the brand but there were some ‘affiliate websites’ which sell Louis Vuitton hand bags. So far nothing wrong, but when I had a closer look at these websites I realised that all of them are selling replicas! Probably some website hosted in China or another country where is difficult for Louis Vuitton to close them.</p>
<p> </p>
<div id="attachment_514" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://www.charles-henry.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/louis-vuitton-google.JPG"><img class="size-full wp-image-514" title="louis-vuitton-google" src="http://www.charles-henry.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/louis-vuitton-google.JPG" alt="Louis Vuitton Google Result Page" width="500" height="553" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Louis Vuitton Google Result Page</p></div>
<p>I am pretty sure that Louis Vuitton is spending a lot of money on legal action but doing nothing online regarding this issue. I am not sure that it is the right move&#8230;</p>
<p>This is why Louis Vuitton should set-up a search engine reputation management (SERM) campaign. Technically, they have to push down the replica websites on Google results page and it would be a lot more difficult for the people who are just looking for the brand to find these websites.</p>
<p>With this strategy they could possibly damage these websites more quickly than through lengthy legal actions&#8230;</p>
<p>This just goes to show how SERM can be used for different and unexpected situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.charles-henry.com/2009/10/search-engine-reputation-management-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

